John Edwards / Donald Haines / David Haines

The following information is critical to understanding John Edwards relationships amongst many companies and leads to a connection with NevWest Securities and Crown the market maker.

We have address links again by following Nevada Secretary of State information and information provided in the Sec Filings of various companies.

7500 W. Lake Mead Blvd.
First Colony Merchant, Mining Feasibility Capital Corp, Web Street Journal.com
All of these companies are purported to run out of suite 9627.

Now

Mining Feasibility Capital Corporation is of particular interest here as we find this in SEC filings of CROWN HOLDINGS (CRWN)

(4) Represents 3,210 shares of privately sold Series A Preferred, which are convertible into 3,210,000 shares of common stock, purchased by Mining Feasibility Capital Corp. during March and April 2005 in a privately negotiated transaction. The preferred stock share issuance was approved by our Board. The mailing address of Mining Feasibility Capital Corp. is 1350 E. Flamingo Road, Suite 342, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119.

http://www.secinfo.com/d14D5a.z3tZ9.htm#2rvk
Notice the address of 1350 Flamingo Road in this filing.
Also found at that address are the following companies:

This information shows us John Edwards holding over 3 million shares of Crown Securities common stock. Please take note: The private sale involved SERIES A PREFERRED shares convertible to common stock. Would this be a way to circumvent 144 restrictions on the shares?

Tundra Resources, St.George Metals, Environmental Monitoring and Testing / Netchoice

Tundra Resources, Inc. is a Nevada corporation formed on December 31, 1998. Its principal place of business is located at, 1350 East Flamingo Road, Suite 688, Las Vegas, NV 89119.

BUSINESS OF ISSUER
TUNDRA RESOURCES, INC. was organized to engage in any lawful corporate business, including but not limited to, exploration, development, production and sale of oil and gas and secondarily in the development of mineral properties. The primary activity of TUNDRA RESOURCES, INC. currently involves the procurement of mineral leasehold interest in Arizona. The Company has no current business operations.

http://www.secinfo.com/d123Y7.z1q.htm (Tundra Resources)
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/CorpDetails.aspx?CorpID=187851
SGGM

Environmental Monitoring & Testing Corporation (the “Company") is a Delaware corporation incorporated on May 10, 1988. The Company was engaged in the business of drilling wells, primarily for the purpose of environmental monitoring and testing, principally in South Carolina and Georgia. On December 31, 2001 the Company liquidated its real estate and drilling assets. Since December 31, 2001 the Company has had no operations.
The Company maintains its corporate offices at 1350 East Flamingo Road, Suite 688, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 and its telephone number is (702) 376-3373.

http://www.secinfo.com/d123Y7.z14.htm
(Environmental Monitoring and Testing)

http://www.secinfo.com/$/SEC/Filing.asp?404;http://www.secinfo.com/dpN58.21.d.htm?Find=Edwards&Line;=354#Line354
John Edwards agreement.

Netchoice is born in Feb 2005 from Environmental Monitoring and Testing
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=ntch.ob
http://www.secinfo.com/d169rh.z7p.htm?Find=Netchoice&Line;=64#Line64

Netchoice, INC.
(name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
1350 E. Flamingo Road, Suite 688
Las Vegas, NV 89119
(Address of principal executive offices)

These companies records connect the two addresses 1350 E. Flamingo Rd and 7500 W Lake Mead Blvd to the following group: John Edwards, Don Haines, Mark Giebelhaus,

We first found Haines with Eurosoft out of Florida, he was the registered agent for them in that state. Timothy Cammell was appointed president by John Edwards in that company.

Haines is also involved with SGGM first as a resident agent and sole

officer/director. Now Giebelhaus is in place and Haines appears to be gone from SGGM. Haines is also the sole officer and director of Netchoice a company formerly known as Environmental Monitoring and testing both of which reside at the same address currently.

Haines is also the sole director of Holmes Herbs, another former David Coffey company

Now Haines is found as the Sole officer and director of Mining Feasibility Capital Corp, based at the two addresses.

Based on this information and his links to the Lake Mead and E Flamingo addresses, we can safely deduce that Mr. Haines is either an associate or an assigns of John Edwards.

REMEMBER the 7500 W Lake Mead Address is listed for Web Street Journal with McIntyre, and John Lee, and of course First Colony Merchant with McIntyre, John Lee, and John Edwards.

“There is an appointed time for everything, and a time for every affair under the heavens” Ecc 3,1

I’ll give it a try Debi. I think Urban got caught in this Vegas web, trying to get financing for his dream. He was and is, a wildcatter at heart. He got his financing and put his “team” together to handle the business while he went off to find diamonds and more. The problem was that he turned over business decisions to people he thought were “friends” of the company. Like most of us, he probably couldn’t imagine that the people who were investing the money would try to destroy the company, so he assumed they were friendlies. Perhaps he just didn’t forsee that those same people would try to destroy the company so that they could take it over.

I think he got some clues that there were problems, back in 03 when he was encouraging people to pull certs. But he probably thought it was just the market makers who were after him. He probably still did not realize it was his own “friends” who may have been encouraging the MM’s to NS in order to drive the company into bankruptcy so that they could take it over.

I think he finally discovered what was going on, last spring as we see him start to dismantle deals and bring Roger on board. Since that time he has been attempting to undo the damage that was done, or attempted.

We are just beginning to see the tip of the iceberg as to how far the tangled web extended. But like all cancers, it spread quickly.

“There is an appointed time for everything, and a time for every affair under the heavens” Ecc 3,1

A kernel of truth

For those of you that have read and commented on the DD we posted last night, thank you for all your thoughts both “negative” and “positive”, all are welcome where we come from, and we hope that open communication in this forum will continue and indeed grow.

The reason for this post before we release anymore of our DD on here is to clarify our position collectively and try to put it into perspective for all of us to understand and hopefully appreciate.

First things first. Who is Columbo? In reality Columbo is a tight knit group of friends that initially all met through CMKX, be it on Paltalk Proboards, RB, IHUB or Skype. We have as a group been doing deep DD for over a year now, and through all the disagreements and the moments of hope and happiness have stuck together as a team. Metaphorically speaking you are all part of Columbo, each shareholder in CMKX and its web of affiliations. We garner our information off of the internet, and from publicly available documents. Our goal when we started was to just find out some kernel of truth regarding the company we invested in. That said, we have found a lot of pieces, but not the whole truth, it is our belief that no one has found that to this point. Our search continues. We thank each and every person for all of the information they have posted, much of it is very interesting stuff to say the least and all a part of the path to the ultimate answers to all of our questions.

The next subject we want to touch on is that of affiliations. Many of the questions that were elicited from our post last night were legitimate questions, although some left us scratching our heads, most were good. One that we found particularly interesting was one requesting information on which “hedgy” we are a part of. The answer, NONE. Some of us don’t even know how a hedge fund works, let alone how you become a part of one, the answer is no we are not a hedge fund or anyone associated with one. We are not a part of or a party to any Brokerage Firm, Regulatory Body, Law Enforcement (past or present) nor are we part of any promotional or advertising body. We do not “pump” stocks, nor do we condone or support anyone that does. We do not personally know Pedro, George Burns, or any of the other publicly known figures. We have had some basic conversations with different individuals on the Internet or in the chat rooms, but we have no affiliations with anyone but ourselves. As for the Owners Group, some have suggested that Bill Frizzell and John Martin are behind us. That is absolutely untrue, we are our own voice, a collection of people from far and wide that only have one objective, to uncover some facts.

Further to any of the above people / entities, we are greatly interested in the information that has come out recently, it sheds a lot of light on different things we have been researching. We welcome that information flow, and feel we can contribute in an objective and sensible way. We have been asked specifically about the Owners Group and will answer the questions people have had with this statement. We support what the owners group is doing thus far, and the things they have posted on the Internet. The work they have done is something we have found to be valuable in our research. The power of everyone being united in one group certainly is an ideal that we share, and last night’s post was the beginning of our contribution to that end. Do we shareholders have the same feelings on every issue? NO we do not. No group ever does but we would support having open dialogue with everyone and keeping an open mind to everything that is going on and things that are said. Anything less is just being a “yes man” so to speak and we are not interested in thinking along any “party lines”.

Next are Pedro and George Burns. One thing that we as a group recognise is the fact that different people appear to have spent their own money and time on a lot of DD and research oriented materials. The freedom of information act info from Pedro for one comes to mind. We as fellow shareholders appreciate the effort put forth to get that information shared with others. That said however do we all agree to everything that was said about that information? NO, but this information cannot and should not be overlooked. All of it needs to be read over and over and absorbed.

As we stated earlier Columbo is many of us. Many diverse opinions and interpretations, many questions some still unanswered. This is not a secretive cult, we will continue to post what we hope is relevant information, some will be, some may turn out not to be, but we hope that it is at least helpful to some of you in our quest for a kernel of truth. In closing we will also state absolutely none of us are affiliated with CMKX. We do not know any of the insiders, and we are not disseminating any information for them. We are not privy to inside information. We hope this clears up some of the questions that have been asked regarding “who you are”.

Columbo

OK ....... Looks like we have dropped Ian McIntyre as being named on the Edwards Agreements.

And it looks like the discussion has turned to the amount of shares that the “Edwards Entities” have sold.

But were still on the subject of:

“Why Is Ian MacIntyre on John Edwards Trust agreements that sold 276bill shares of CMKX?”

>
>
>

All of these companies that you provided are claimed to be owned and/or controlled by “Edwards.”

I am not going to research every one of these companies to verify that “Edwards” was in fact controlling each entity. So I will trust that you and the TF did your/their DD on each entity.

But .....

There are two (2) problems I see when determining the quantity of shares that have been issued to the “Edward Entities.”

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Problem 1

The number that you calculated, 289 Billion Shares (289,537,675,506) .....
The number is not correct.

The reason why the number is not correct is because you have not considered the certificates that were exchanged. And any exchanges would double up the total issued.

Example:

Company “A” was issued a 500 million certificate in the name of company “A.”

At a later date, company “A” returns the certificate back to the transfer agent and the transfer agent reissues a new certificate in the name of company “B”

This transaction, changing the name on the certificate, this transaction will double the amount issued to record 1 billion shares. However, the original issuance was only 500 million shares.

And then if company “B” returns the certificate back to the transfer agent, and the name is changed again to company “C,” that will triple the issued to 1.5 billion when the original issuance was only 500 million.

That’s the game that “Edwards” played.
Edwards shuffled the certificates back and forth to different companies.

And eventually the shares ended up being surrendered to CEDE.

Then there are the restricted certificated that were returned to the transfer agent and the transfer agent reissued a new certificate with the restriction stamp removed. This transaction will double up the issued shares too.

The below PDF file shows the original issuance to each entity on your list.

http://convert.neevia.com/prods/2f61407e-fcb1-491b-a060-4cb2c662171a.cvn/1.pdf

The number I come up with is:
~~ 148 billion shares (148,443,790,611).

Check out the original issuances and pop away with any questions.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Problem 2

Again, you’re claiming that all these companies on your list are owned and/or controlled by “Edwards.” I am not sure whether you are claiming the “Edwards” relationship by the address of each entity (being the same address), or if there is a document to back up that “Edwards” has control?

Because the ABDU trust was located at: 1350 E. Flamingo Road, Suite 342
And AGAP Serene Services was located at: 7500 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Suite 9627

I am not going to check every single entities address and/or every single entities available documents, so I will accept that the list reflects what you claim.

But I do have a few questions as to why you’re claiming certain entities are owned and/or controlled by “Edwards.”

--------------------------------------

The Canadian Companies that you claim are linked as being owned and/or controlled by “Edwards.”

Aruma Mining, Inc.
Is located at: 505 8840-210th Street Suite 407, Langley, British Columbia

And

Bazzaro gears, Inc.
Is also located at: 505 8840-210th Street Suite 407, Langley, British Columbia

Both have the same address.

But ……. Berama Giorgio, Inc.
Has an address of: 20641 Logan Avenue Suite 206, Langley, British Columbia

How are you verifying these Canadian Companies as being control and/or owned by Edwards?

--------------------------------------

And then there’s Elan First Merchant Limited.

Two separate companies located in Nevada and British Columbia:

~ 20641 Logan Avenue Suite 206, Langley, British Columbia
~ 7500 W. Lake Mead Blvd. Suite 9627, Las Vegas, NV

How are you joining the two separate companies as one entity?
What documents do you have that show the Canadian Company is owned and/or controlled by Edwards?

Because this example has been repeated many time:
~ De La Norte Trading
~ Inde Enterprises
~ Kolba Meadmakers
~ and others

--------------------------------------

And then there are individuals.
Names of personal people (not business’s or trusts).

~ Anita Cohen
~ Jeannie Kinney
~ Anthony Rick
~ Frank Ormstead
~ Sandias Azucara

How are you relating these people as being controlled by Edwards?

“There is an appointed time for everything, and a time for every affair under the heavens” Ecc 3,1

The Sept-2002 10Q filed showing the OS as being 352,223,510 shares.
Here is the shareholder list showing the 352 million shares.

http://convert.neevia.com/prods/717b7cb2-fb64-4bc2-ada6-9d4edf519103.cvn/2.pdf

So when I review the shareholder list, I really don’t see any conspiracy of certain people being issued large quantities of shares? I see relatively small amounts issued to certain people/companies, of which their holdings are not material when compared to the OS being over 7 billion shares in February 2003.

I do know that right before the CMKX merger, shares were issued through a private placement. See page 5:

http://convert.neevia.com/prods/5b09ecb2-013a-4d38-9c4e-00ef985aaa7b.cvn/2a.pdf

Now, when looking through the period of Apr-2002 through Feb-2003, what was transpiring during this time?

Apr-2002 is when Cybermark incorporated in Nevada. And there was a reason for Cymbermark to incorporate in Nevada. Did Urban approach Cybermark before or after Cybermark incorporated in Nevada? I do not know and I believe that is not material.

What is material is that Urban was discussing with Cybermark and negotiating terms and conditions for the Cybermak-Fort a la Corne merger. And I view these talks running back and forth from Apr-2002 through Nov-2002.

Then the two parties came to an agreement and the merger was announced during Nov-2002.

But the paperwork was not complete and filed with the SEC until Feb-2003. Hence, why the Feb-2003 DEF 14C indicated the agreement was retroactive to Nov-2002.

After all the terms and conditions were settled and compensation, Cybermark issued shares to all the parties that were involved with the merger. And it was this time that many of your “Edward” entities were issued shares.

But keep in mind that the transfer agent was only able to issue a certain amount of certificates each day because of manual labor (time) that was necessary to prepare each certificate. And keep in mind that the minutes of the meeting showed a continuation of talks through Nov-2002 through Feb-2003.

But after the all talks were finished and all compensation in shares was agreed, the transfer agent issued all the certificates according to the minutes of the merger agreements.

So when the DEF 14C indicated the OS was 7 billion shares (7,241,653,404), the master shareholder list indicated the OS was owned by:

http://convert.neevia.com/prods/339f5050-70fb-4cc8-8884-4616fffca871.cvn/3.pdf

And the reason why the shares were issued:

http://convert.neevia.com/prods/f8100342-e837-4134-9110-94333739671a.cvn/3a.pdf

So when you write:
“..... recieve shares In CMKX months before the Casavants were issued a single share?”

I see they received their shares as “a part of the distribution” and/or “at the same time” when the Casavants received their shares.

The only discrepancies I see would be the time delays between:
~ Each Board Meeting.
~ Sending the minutes to transfer agent.
~ Transfer agent preparing certificates.

Pop away any questions!

“There is an appointed time for everything, and a time for every affair under the heavens” Ecc 3,1

And I have recorded Chris Jenson as receiving 1.1 billion shares and the reason why:

http://convert.neevia.com/prods/712e6da0-f3b7-4615-8368-c203898ea9ed.cvn/4.pdf

1.1 Billion Shares is somewhere around 15% of 7 billion shares.

I see Chris Jenson owning 15% of CMKX after the DEF 14C.

But what I don’t see are names associated with this lawsuit as being related to the “Edward” entities?

I see Julie Jenson as a shareholder of a company.
I see Julie Jenson was angry when the company was diluted.
And I see Julie Jenson suing the company and certain individuals to get her money back.

“There is an appointed time for everything, and a time for every affair under the heavens” Ecc 3,1

END

Some DD

WOW

That is a lot of good DD......TY